Collection

Natural History

Fossils, minerals and meteorites selected for preparation quality, scientific interest and presence.

Petrified and crystallised ammonite photographed against a dark ground.
Representative collection image · Jurii / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 3.0

How we catalogue it

Specimens are chosen for preparation quality and scientific interest before decorative appeal. Preference is given to material with recorded locality and collection data, and to preparation carried out by known hands. Restoration and composite mounting are stated plainly in every entry.

Fossils · Minerals · Meteorites

Currently catalogued02

Where an entry has not yet been photographed its plate is shown blank. Featherstone Vaults photography replaces them entry by entry; no stand-in imagery is used.

Buying in this department

What we look for

Preparation accounts for a great deal of what a specimen is worth, and for most of what can go wrong with it. A heavily prepared fossil in which the preparator has reconstructed detail that was never there looks better than an honest one and is worth considerably less. We ask who prepared a specimen, and we examine preparation under ultraviolet light, which shows adhesives and fills that are invisible in normal light.

Composite specimens, assembled from more than one individual, are common in some groups and are not always disclosed. We decline them, or we describe them as composite in the entry and price them accordingly.

Locality and classification

A specimen with a recorded locality, horizon and collection date is a different object from the same specimen without them. The difference is permanent, because the information cannot be reconstructed later. We give the collection data we hold and we say plainly when it is absent or inferred rather than recorded.

Meteorites are a separate case. Classification by a recognised laboratory and an entry in the Meteoritical Bulletin Database are the baseline, and the official name and classification appear in the entry. An uncatalogued stone is described as uncatalogued.

Worth asking

Has it been restored, and where exactly. Is the matrix original to the specimen or has it been added. Is the locality recorded or inferred. For a meteorite, is it classified, and under what name.

These are reasonable questions and any dealer should be able to answer them in writing. If an answer is not forthcoming, that is itself an answer.

Further reading

From the Journal05

Research written against this department: what to check, what the documents should say, and where the record usually stops.

From the archive01